Confusion Among 3rd Year MBBS Students Over ENT and Ophthalmology!

The journey of medical education in India is often marked by rigorous training, countless hours of studying, and navigating through a ocean of subjects. However, recent developments have raised confusion among 3rd-year MBBS students across the country. The National Medical Commission (NMC) has announced the shifting of two critical subjects, ENT (Ear, Nose, and Throat) and Ophthalmology, from the 3rd professional examination to the 4th year (final year) of MBBS curriculum. While some colleges have promptly informed students about this change through circulars, many institutions have left their students in the dark, leading to uncertainty and hindering academic planning.

Traditionally, the 3rd professional examination in medical colleges encompassed four subjects: Forensic Medicine and Toxicology (FMT), Preventive and Social Medicine (PSM), Ophthalmology, and ENT. However, with the NMC’s recent directive, two subjects have been slated for inclusion in the 4th professional examination. This decision holds significant implications for MBBS students, particularly in terms of their academic trajectory, study schedules, and preparation for postgraduate (PG) or the National Exit Test (NEXT) exam.

NMC Curriculum & Guideline – 2023 for MBBS Phase I & Phase II
(refer page no. 32 & 33) & NMC Curriculum 21-22 (refer page 2, point d,e)

The lack of uniformity in information about this curriculum change has led to widespread confusion among 3rd-year MBBS students. While some colleges have promptly issued circulars informing students about the revised examination pattern, others have remained silent on the matter. Consequently, students find themselves in uncertainty regarding the inclusion of ENT and Ophthalmology in their upcoming examinations.

The absence of clear guidelines has left students perplexed about how to plan their study schedules effectively. Many students are unsure whether they should continue studying these subjects for their 3rd professional examination or defer their preparation until the 4th year. This ambiguity not only adds undue stress to an already demanding academic journey but also affects students’ preparedness for future examinations, including PG entrance tests.

In light of the prevailing confusion, NMC and universities should step forward and clear their stand. Timely communication and clear directives from the authorities are essential to alleviate the concerns of students and enable them to plan their academic pursuits effectively. This notification should be circulated to all medical colleges across the country to ensure uniformity in implementation. Secondly, universities and medical colleges must proactively communicate with their students regarding the revised curriculum and examination schedule.